REGISTER|LOGIN

Welcome, filler

MY PROFILE
LOGOUT

The Faster We Go, The Rounder We Get

April 29, 2011 10:00AM EDT By Andy Weissman
Share | |

The faster real time social merges with television, the more valuable live television becomes... beyond sports. – Jason Hirschhorn

If we are all gonna die anyway shouldn't we be enjoying ourselves now? You know, I'd like to quit thinking of the present, like right now, as some minor insignificant preamble to something else.
Dazed and Confused


It feels like one of the themes emerging in 2011 is that “social media will kill the DVR.” To wit, social media conversations in real time are the new water cooler, except that they are happening while that content is being viewed – not the day after. Says this New York Times article: “Twitter and Facebook messages about shows may well be the most efficient way to drive tune-in.” Taken to its extreme, this conversation about content will incent users to watch that content live, in real time, so they can participate in that conversation. Live television – the Oscars, the Grammys, American Idol, the Superbowl – becomes even more interesting once that real time social layers merge with the broadcast.

I subscribe to this idea, fundamentally.  It is consistent with what we at betaworks believe is the most important part of real time social media. It essentially (and disruptively) alters the distribution of content. Instead of tightly coupled and controlled distribution and marketing, social media redefines how content – any content, broadly defined – is discovered, promoted and ultimately consumed. While a historical shift, this newer process does not posit that content is any less valuable. Indeed the opposite is proving to be true. But the way that content gets distributed is being disrupted, redefined and reimagined.

While attention lately has been focused on live events, where social media intersects with “catalog” content can be much more interesting - all those films we grew up with, the ones we saw last year, 10 years ago, 20 years ago. Currently, the experience around catalog content is static (I want to watch Dazed and Confused again, so I rent it, stream it, buy the DVD).  Similarly, the price is static, or at least difficult to determine optimally. On-demand viewing is primarily a technical challenge, one that has little to do with real time social. So, while video on demand and streaming web content is exciting for users - this one-to-one experience that exists today is contrary to how social media is intersecting with live events. Yet this catalog of films has provided enormous richness to all of our entertainment experiences.

Social media changes everything – at least it should. So how can it change the way catalog content is distributed and experienced?


We can learn a lot from Groupon, the daily deals leader. Groupon takes a commodity product (flowers, yoga classes, chocolate) and turns that commodity into a live event by giving the user a bargain, an incentive to socialize the offer and a limited time within with that offer is available.  

Groupon utilizes the very definition of real time social media.

This model – intersecting social media with a commodity – is a massive and thus far untapped opportunity with respect to content. While Jason Hirschhorn rightfully feels that live events become more valuable as they intersect with social real time media, I think the same – and more – is also true for movies, and for that catalog of content to be reinvigorated and redefined.


 
Andy Weissman

Andy Weissman is a partner at Union Square Ventures. Andy began his career in the Internet at AOL in the mid-90s, then managed a series of venture funds with Dawntreader Ventures. In 2007, he co-founded betaworks, a new media company based in New York that both builds companies and invests in them. You can follow him on Twitter.

The Future of Film blog is a place where leading filmmakers and experts within the film industry share their thoughts on film, technology and the future of media.

 

Join the Conversation

 
David Pakman
Apr 29, 2011
07:46 AM
Fascinating thoughts, Andy. Do you envision "scarcity" time-based offers will emerge for catalog content, like "we are streaming Caddyshack today only and Harold Ramis is taking questions during the broadcast on twitter"? Will these events be pay-per-view, ad supported or something else?
Andy Weissman
Apr 29, 2011
08:12 AM
D - that scarcity - or some version of it - is exactly what I envision. I imagine they will be pay per view, but could also be any number of ways. Of course, this is something we are working on at betaworks ;-)
Greg Battle
Apr 29, 2011
09:11 AM
Sustainable artificial scarcity is the new Holy Grail of addictive behavior. And if you think you can only do this for movies, wait until you see some of the things I've been privy to hearing about in music. Exciting times.
Bear
Apr 29, 2011
08:34 AM
... in the fourth dimension.
jim louderback
Apr 29, 2011
09:19 AM
Still waiting for our Quadlibet for Tender Feet
Ted Rheingold
Apr 29, 2011
01:26 PM
*GREAT* Quotes and Title ;)

And great insights. I completely buy in on the popularity it will bring. But the joy of the DVR is being able to watch your most desired entertainment at the exact moment you are free to do so. But I'm 40 so maybe not a great use case, ... and I can definitely remember years in my 20s where certain week nights revolved around getting together with friends in time for the Simpsons, or XFiles or Seinfeld.

I see this starting to happen with broadcast television programming. Anthony Boudrain tweeting and answering questions live during an new airing of No Reservations feels almost epic change in tv programming. But the cross time-zone problem is real. He's gone to bed by the time it airs on the West Coast. Will real-time distributed entertainment have happen at the same moment or is Betaworks already working on that problem so friends in HK, London, NYC and LA can be together even when watching at different times? I'd love to help work on that if it's of interest ;)
arrose
Apr 29, 2011
07:24 PM
http://mashable.com/2011/04/28/scarcity-economics/
Why the End of Scarcity Will Change the Economics of Everything [OPINION]
Brandon Kessler
Apr 30, 2011
04:05 AM
Good one Andy. I don't know about you but for me the Howard Stern "Private Parts" Twitter event was eye-opening.
awaldstein
Apr 30, 2011
04:19 AM
I couldn't agree more with you Andy. I've long believed that building flash communities around time-shifted media is a huge opportunity. And one that few are focusing on.

I first ran into SocialBomb who were early in doing this with True Blood and posted on this @ http://bit.ly/cQUAnz

And some further thoughts on streaming and social on catalog materials @ http://bit.ly/h5oMhL

Thanks for this post. I didn't know about Betaworks prior.
D. Fishman
Apr 30, 2011
10:53 AM
I often dream about the intersection of the physical world, retail product inventory, and the social web! No different just another data set. Insomniacs rejoice!
Aaron Cohen
Apr 30, 2011
03:41 PM
Andy:

As you others that have posted and who read this blog know, this has been the focus of my work for the past three years. At first, I tried it with AnyClip but for many reasons that model was challenged.

Now, I've assembled a group of impressive entrepreneurs to build a set of tools to empower filmmakers to distribute their own films utilizing the vision you lay out in conjunction with David Pakman in this thread.

David knows I was a bit resistant to starting a new company. Then he gave a talk at my class about the problems the Internet community is having creating demand-creation advertising. He said that google helps people find what they are looking for, but has no answer for helping them find what they don't know they want.

Pakman's framework coupled with the problems I face as a producer and filmmaker lead me back to a discussion I had begun over the past year about how to disrupt the film industry -- an industry that you subtly argue has avoided embracing the changes afoot.

I think Hirschorn's thesis is likely to see the biggest breakthroughs in the independent film movement. My reasoning: Nearly 90% of the films made in this country are never released. There is so much supply and no way for it to find demand. In part, these filmmakers face a a demand creation problem. Why should anybody see their films?

We think the answer is empowering these creative entrepreneurs to market their own films to their respective social graphs. When creative people have technologies that allow them to organize and self-promote they market successfully. It's already working at companies called Etsy, Bandcamp, and FanBridge.

Jason H's insight is right, but we can't look to studios and television networks to get this right. Not even Netflix ( a company I adore) has this on their agenda. These innovations will come from entrepreneurs.