02.12.10
Oscars: The Acting Races
Nathaniel Rogers takes aim at the Academy Awards actor nominees to see who deserves an Oscar, who's due for one, and who's getting lost in the mix.
If years of Oscar watching have taught us anything, it's that the Academy almost never varies from general precursor consensus when it comes to acting plaudits. If the Globes, SAG, and the BFCA narrow it down to one name, that's probably your winner.
Oscar winners actually receive their trophies blank. In past years they've had to return them to have their name affixed later. This year, the Academy is doing it a little differently and will be finishing up the statues during the after party. But why all the secrecy when the names are so predetermined? The Academy is actually making engravings for all 20 acting nominees this year… just in case. As if!!! I have more chance of winning Best Supporting Actress than Maggie Gyllenhaal does. They'd be safe engraving just five nameplates.
"Best Actor in a Leading Role: Jeff Bridges, Crazy Heart"
"Best Actor in a Supporting Role: Christoph Waltz, Inglourious Basterds"
"Best Actress in a Supporting Role: Mo'Nique, Precious: Based on the Novel Push by Sapphire"
"Best Actress in a Leading Role: Sandra Bullock, The Blind Side"
OR
"Best Actress in a Leading Role: Meryl Streep, Julie & Julia"
They have to do five because there's still a slim possibility that Meryl Streep could derail the Sandra Bullock bandwagon.
The Golden Globes and the Critics' Choice Awards and the Screen Actors Guild ceremonies should probably air with flashing "SPOILER WARNING" signs. This is why Oscar nomination morning is generally more suspenseful for the jaded Oscarologist than the big show at the Kodak Theater. Anything seems vaguely plausible before the names are read in each category. Afterwards, it's a countdown to the inevitable repeat crownings.
But for argument and analysis' sake, let's take a quick survey of each acting category.
Best Supporting Actor
WILL WIN: Christoph Waltz (Inglourious Basterds)
The Nazi villain will have them shouting, "That's a bingo!" as they mark their ballots.
THE SPOILER: Christopher Plummer (The Last Station)
You'd think an octogenarian screen legend could get more "winner" traction. But it took Captain Von Trapp 52 years of moviemaking just to get a lousy nomination. The one year he could have easily won the whole race (for The Insider), they stiffed him (even of a nomination) and gave Michael Caine a second Oscar instead, this time for The Cider House Rules. It's like Academy members personally blame Plummer every time "Edelweiss" gets stuck in their heads.
SORRY, YOU ALREADY WON: Given the lack of general enthusiasm for Invictus, Matt Damon will have to wait. He can always pretend his screenwriting Oscar (Good Will Hunting) is for his admirable acting skill.
WHAT HAPPENED? Early in the season, Woody Harrelson looked like the Waltz challenger for his by-the-book alcoholic soldier in The Messenger. But something didn't take, campaign-wise. The fact that a small outfit like Oscilloscope got two nods (for The Messenger and for Burma VJ) without the funds of a huge FYC campaign is pretty astounding, although not undeserved.
THE NOMINATION IS THE REWARD: Stanley Tucci (The Lovely Bones)
Best Supporting Actress
WILL WIN: Mo'Nique (Precious: Based on the Novel Push by Sapphire)
She gives, in my estimation, the best of all 20 nominated performances.
THE SPOILER: Anna Kendrick (Up in the Air)
Kendrick worries me a little. If there is an acting category that the Academy takes the least seriously, it's this one. They've been known to throw curveballs here, and they love pretty young things. It's almost like this category is their way to have fun with the audience. Or at least it was in the 1990s. Remember Anna Paquin hyperventilating when she won for The Piano? Or Juliette Binoche (The English Patient) trumping screen legend Lauren Bacall (The Mirror Has Two Faces)?
SORRY, YOU ALREADY WON: Penélope Cruz is messy, sexy, and neurotically funny in Vicky Cristina Barcelona—excuse me—Nine.
WHAT HAPPENED? Vera Farmiga (Up in the Air) is spectacularly sexy, Clooney-compatible, confident, and best-in-her-show. So why is her co-star getting more awards traction? It's a mystery.
THE NOMINATION IS THE REWARD: Maggie Gyllenhaal (Crazy Heart)
Best Actor
WILL WIN: Jeff Bridges (Crazy Heart)
Bridges has been working his way towards an Oscar for 40 years now. There's a trail of superb performances behind him and (hopefully) many more to come. Now that he's front and center in a baity role (alcoholic musician), they'll feel it's time.
THE SPOILER: Before Bridges's film finally confirmed a 2009 release, Colin Firth (A Single Man) was looking like the one to beat for his grieving gay professor.
SORRY, YOU ALREADY WON: George Clooney (Up in the Air) and Morgan Freeman (Invictus)
THE NOMINATION IS THE REWARD: Jeremy Renner (The Hurt Locker)
This performance will get Renner the career boost he's long deserved.
Best Actress
WHO WILL WIN? I'm not ready to say Sandra Bullock (The Blind Side) with any certainty, though she has the current heat. If there's anyone as overdue as Jeff Bridges in this year's competitive pool, it's Meryl Streep (Julie & Julia). While it's true that she has two Oscars, she won them both in the first five years of her career. They threw gold at her for warming up and never for actually being the legend she became.
SORRY, YOU ALREADY WON: Helen Mirren (The Last Station)
THE NOMINATION IS THE REWARD: Carey Mulligan (An Education) will be back to the race rather quickly—just wait and see. Gabby Sidibe (Precious: Based on the Novel Push by Sapphire) won a dream role for her screen debut and did it justice.
So... Sandy or Streep? Or do you think there's more suspense here than previous awards shows have let on?
Nathaniel Rogers blogs on The Film Experience. He is also a bit of an Oscar savant.
More in this series:
The Oscar Combination
Oscars: The Best of... Everything?
The Peoples' Globes
Sundance: The Oscar Connection
Oscar Noms: Ten Talking Points
February 12, 2010 09:30 PM
Robert Hamer said:
AMPAS may like to have fun with Supporting Actress...
...but even they aren't stupid enough to even consider having another actress beat Mo'Nique this year. Her performance is the only one of the 20 nominees, and maybe even the only one of all of last year, that has *unanimous* praise. I have heard NO ONE say that they weren't blown away by her in Precious. Besides, if someone else beats her, the winner will forever have the Grace Kelly curse and will never be able to live down the fact that she "stole" the Oscar from a performance for the ages. AMPAS is not going to want that fate for anyone. Mo'Nique might as well give her acceptance speech right now.
February 13, 2010 05:14 PM
med said:
Streep
Streep has more "heat" than the media and pundits think she has. She has momentum from last year and 26 years of momentum on top of that. Plus, I think she will get the support of "old hollywood" academy voters. I just have a gut felling the Oscar will go to Streep. If not, we will have Bullock to add to the Roberto Benigni major historical miscues made by the Academy...
February 14, 2010 04:12 PM
Gustavo said:
Meryl Streep
I'm not gonna watch the ceremony this year. If Meryl Streep wins, I'll know it later, then check it out on YouTube. I wanted to believe she could win, but the risk of seeing Sandra Bullock defeating her will be too painful to bear.